Scientists at Kyoto University (Japan) found that people cannot distinguish haiku, written by man, from created by artificial intelligence. Writes about it The Mainichi.
Participants in the study rated poetry on a seven-point scale using criteria such as “feeling the beauty of the work.”
As a result, AI-created haiku scored 4.56 points, while human-written haiku scored 4.15.
“These results suggest that the collaboration of human and artificial intelligence contributes to better creative processes in the creation of haiku,” the study says.
Participants were also asked which haiku were created by the algorithm and which were created by humans. It turned out that people can not distinguish between them.
According to the scientists, AI poetry received perfect scores due to the “algorithmic aversion” effect. People tend to believe that higher-quality works are human-made, the researchers added.
Recall that in September, a picture generated by a neural network won the fine art competition.
In July, scientists found that users do not distinguish between images created by a person and a neural network.
Subscribe to Cryplogger news in Telegram: Cryplogger AI – all the news from the world of AI!
Found a mistake in the text? Select it and press CTRL+ENTER
Scientists at Kyoto University (Japan) found that people cannot distinguish haiku, written by man, from created by artificial intelligence. Writes about it The Mainichi.
Participants in the study rated poetry on a seven-point scale using criteria such as “feeling the beauty of the work.”
As a result, AI-created haiku scored 4.56 points, while human-written haiku scored 4.15.
“These results suggest that the collaboration of human and artificial intelligence contributes to better creative processes in the creation of haiku,” the study says.
Participants were also asked which haiku were created by the algorithm and which were created by humans. It turned out that people can not distinguish between them.
According to the scientists, AI poetry received perfect scores due to the “algorithmic aversion” effect. People tend to believe that higher-quality works are human-made, the researchers added.
Recall that in September, a picture generated by a neural network won the fine art competition.
In July, scientists found that users do not distinguish between images created by a person and a neural network.
Subscribe to Cryplogger news in Telegram: Cryplogger AI – all the news from the world of AI!
Found a mistake in the text? Select it and press CTRL+ENTER
