CrypLogger.com
  • Home
  • Exclusive
  • Learn About Coins
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Forecasts
  • News
  • Opinions
  • Current Prices
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Exclusive
  • Learn About Coins
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Forecasts
  • News
  • Opinions
  • Current Prices
No Result
View All Result
CrypLogger
No Result
View All Result
Home News

Amazon Go accused of illegal biometric surveillance

by Vaibhav
March 17, 2023
in News
0
189
SHARES
1.5k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

face_recognition-01

Amazon Go checkout stores have been accused of violating New York City guidelines for informing shoppers about the collection of biometric identifiers.

The corresponding law was adopted in 2021. According to the document, institutions that record the biometric data of visitors must place information signs in a conspicuous place.

The class-action lawsuit against the tech giant alleges that the Amazon Go store on Pine Street did not have prominent signage as required by law. Applicant Rodriguez Pers claims to have sent a letter to the company on February 7, 2023 and noted the lack of information.

According to him, Amazon representatives did not send a response, and the sign appeared in the store “not immediately.”

Representative of the tech giant refuted accusations. The company does not use facial recognition in stores, he said. Instead, Amazon identifies visitors by the palm of their hand.

“These individuals are provided with appropriate privacy information during the registration process. The client always controls identification with the palm of his hand, ”the company said.

Amazon opened the first checkout store in New York in 2019. Customers can take any goods from the shelves and leave the establishment, bypassing the cashier.

The company says it uses computer vision, deep learning algorithms and sensor fusion to track consumers’ “virtual shopping carts”. The system is able to take into account the number of positions taken, as well as remove products that the visitor returned to the shelf.

See also  Dungeon & Dragons Publisher Drops NFT Ban Under Pressure...

Shoppers can enter the store by scanning the app’s QR code, credit card, or pointing their palm to the sensor.

The lawsuit alleges that Amazon continues to receive biometric information about buyers. The company tracks people based on body shape and analyzes their movements until they leave the store, the statement said.

Perez also argues that the sign that appeared was misleading. It states that the store will not record biometrics if customers do not use a palm scanner.

However, according to the plaintiff, Amazon Go still collects this information.

According to the law, violators have 30 days after filing a complaint to comply with the requirements. Otherwise, they may face fines and litigation.

If a company is found to have violated the rules, it can be ordered to pay compensation up to $5,000 for each proven case.

Perez is seeking a jury trial and damages for himself and “other clients whose rights have been violated.”

Rodriguez Perez v Amazon by Cryplogger AI on Scribd

Recall that in June 2022, Google was fined $ 100 million for violating the privacy law of user biometric data in Illinois (USA).

Subscribe to Cryplogger on social networks

Found a mistake in the text? Select it and press CTRL+ENTER

Cryplogger Newsletters: Keep your finger on the pulse of the bitcoin industry!

Related articles

Sam Bankman-Fried demands indictment before…

Sam Bankman-Fried hires Donald Trump’s personal lawyer

April 1, 2023
Nigeria set limits on cash withdrawals

Nigeria set limits on cash withdrawals

April 1, 2023

face_recognition-01

Amazon Go checkout stores have been accused of violating New York City guidelines for informing shoppers about the collection of biometric identifiers.

See also  The end of the SEC and Ripple case?

The corresponding law was adopted in 2021. According to the document, institutions that record the biometric data of visitors must place information signs in a conspicuous place.

The class-action lawsuit against the tech giant alleges that the Amazon Go store on Pine Street did not have prominent signage as required by law. Applicant Rodriguez Pers claims to have sent a letter to the company on February 7, 2023 and noted the lack of information.

According to him, Amazon representatives did not send a response, and the sign appeared in the store “not immediately.”

Representative of the tech giant refuted accusations. The company does not use facial recognition in stores, he said. Instead, Amazon identifies visitors by the palm of their hand.

“These individuals are provided with appropriate privacy information during the registration process. The client always controls identification with the palm of his hand, ”the company said.

Amazon opened the first checkout store in New York in 2019. Customers can take any goods from the shelves and leave the establishment, bypassing the cashier.

The company says it uses computer vision, deep learning algorithms and sensor fusion to track consumers’ “virtual shopping carts”. The system is able to take into account the number of positions taken, as well as remove products that the visitor returned to the shelf.

See also  Interpol will now investigate crimes in...

Shoppers can enter the store by scanning the app’s QR code, credit card, or pointing their palm to the sensor.

The lawsuit alleges that Amazon continues to receive biometric information about buyers. The company tracks people based on body shape and analyzes their movements until they leave the store, the statement said.

Perez also argues that the sign that appeared was misleading. It states that the store will not record biometrics if customers do not use a palm scanner.

However, according to the plaintiff, Amazon Go still collects this information.

According to the law, violators have 30 days after filing a complaint to comply with the requirements. Otherwise, they may face fines and litigation.

If a company is found to have violated the rules, it can be ordered to pay compensation up to $5,000 for each proven case.

Perez is seeking a jury trial and damages for himself and “other clients whose rights have been violated.”

Rodriguez Perez v Amazon by Cryplogger AI on Scribd

Recall that in June 2022, Google was fined $ 100 million for violating the privacy law of user biometric data in Illinois (USA).

Subscribe to Cryplogger on social networks

Found a mistake in the text? Select it and press CTRL+ENTER

Cryplogger Newsletters: Keep your finger on the pulse of the bitcoin industry!

Share76Tweet47

Related Posts

Sam Bankman-Fried demands indictment before…

Sam Bankman-Fried hires Donald Trump’s personal lawyer

by Vaibhav
April 1, 2023
0

Disgraced crypto businessman hired one of the best lawyers Mark CohenPreviously, he personally worked with Donald Trump. He also appeared...

Nigeria set limits on cash withdrawals

Nigeria set limits on cash withdrawals

by Vaibhav
April 1, 2023
0

The Nigerian government believes that the digital currency is much more convenient to useThe country is promoting the policy of...

Trade in Trump’s NFT collection is angry after the court

Trade in Trump’s NFT collection is angry after the court

by Vaibhav
April 1, 2023
0

The volume of trading in the NFT-collection from the images of the ex-president of the United States Donald Trump has...

Paraguay denied miners the status of industry participants

Paraguay denied miners the status of industry participants

by Vaibhav
April 1, 2023
0

Deputies of Paraguay rejected the bill on the recognition of minersSuch a law would allow them to reduce their energy...

Chainlink launches LINK token staking

Chainlink launches LINK token staking

by Vaibhav
April 1, 2023
0

Chainlink blockchain oracle launches staking serviceIt is available to those on the early list.Razlok will open in 9-12 monthsChain Labs...

Load More

Recent News

  • Sam Bankman-Fried hires Donald Trump’s personal lawyer
  • Nigeria set limits on cash withdrawals
  • Trade in Trump’s NFT collection is angry after the court
  • Paraguay denied miners the status of industry participants
  • Chainlink launches LINK token staking
  • Daily: Venture goes to Web3 – Stream with Hypra Fund
  • FSB takes control of the crypto industry. Why is this disturbing…
  • Tether launches offshore yuan-pegged stablecoin
  • Spain opens tender for wholesale CBDC operations
  • The court ordered Celsius to transfer $44 million to customers from depository accounts
  • Coinbase CEO Expects 50% Drop in Revenue
  • US to Check SBF for TerraUSD and Luna Market Manipulation
  • ConstitutionDAO2 wants to buy a copy of the US Constitution
  • DEX SushiSwap is facing a shortage of funds. The price of the exchange token fell…
  • Over 3,600 Bitcoin ATMs Shut Down, Record Monthly Drop
  • Ankr to allocate $15 million to pay off HAY mined due to exploit
  • The ECB proposes to ban tokens with “excessive environmental…
  • “Agenda on the table.” Frida can be forcibly escorted to…
  • In Ukraine, an underground mining farm was disguised as a studio
  • Binance Labs Invests in DeFi Security Startup GoPlus Security

Follow Us On Twitter

  • Home
  • About Us
  • CCPA
  • Contact Us
  • DMCA
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
Email: contact@cryplogger.com

© 2021-23 Cryplogger.com
CrypLogger is a cult magazine about bitcoin, blockchain technology and the digital economy. Every day we supply news and analytics on the cryptocurrency market since 2021.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Forecasts
  • News
  • Opinions

© 2021-23 Cryplogger.com
CrypLogger is a cult magazine about bitcoin, blockchain technology and the digital economy. Every day we supply news and analytics on the cryptocurrency market since 2021.

Go to mobile version